Check This Contract if You Are a Human

Jared Stipelman

Share Post:

The first returns have arrived in the battle between copyright holders and technology companies over whether AI training on artist data, or the use of AI to simulate artist styles constitute copyright infringement, and they are not encouraging for those who like their art human. For example:

  1. Courts have determined that training AI on lawfully acquired works of art is not copyright infringement.[1]
  2. Courts have determined that an AI-generated work with a prompt to be in the “style” of an existing author does not, in itself, violate that author’s copyrights or moral rights.[2]
  3. Congress has proposed legislation that would limit the ability of states to set their own laws and frameworks around AI.[3]
  4. The President has released an AI Framework that explicitly calls for loosening intellectual property protections in order to speed up AI developments and ensure competitiveness internationally.[4]

At the same time, generative AI programs continue to grow their capacity to produce works of literature, music, and visual art cheaply and with minimal prompting. In this sort of environment, what is an artist or aspiring designer to do, other than get a new second job? Fortunately, there are certain, legally-tested strategies that a determined artist may use to ensure the integrity and value of their work, even in these uncertain times. These include:

  1. Poison Pills: Existing software can turn visual art or other downloadable content into a poison pill that interferes with AI model training.[5]
  2. Harnessing AI against AI: Certain software programs use AI to detect style mimicry in AI-generated output, which allows for public shaming of those who use pirated works, and creates a diagnostic trail to support litigation for copyright infringement.[6]
  3. Embodied Artwork: AI can cheaply imitate digital works in all forms but cannot pick up a pen or a brush. We encourage, when feasible, our clients to embody their artwork and ideas in physical media that AI cannot duplicate, and which can have print runs, or access controlled.
  4. Brand Development: Many humans still want human-produced artwork, and by developing a strong personal brand (including intellectual property protections), you can ensure that what your patrons are buying is your
  5. Contracts: Contracts can include restrictions on use and distribution, and penalties for violation, that are far more protective than what can be achieved with a simple copyright or similar intellectual property protection. We encourage clients to proactively negotiate with distributors, galleries, and similar stakeholders to include strong restrictions on use and publication in all contracts.
We understand if you would prefer to devote your creative energy to your art—please feel free to leave the left-brain thinking about how to protect your magnum opus to your attorneys at Milgrom, Daskam, and Ellis.

 

 

[1] See, e.g., Bartz v. Anthropic PBC (Judge Alsup, June 23, 2025) and Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc. (Judge Chhabria, June 25, 2025).

[2] See, e.g., Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd., 3:23-cv-00201 – CourtListener.com

[3] See Text – S.4178 – 118th Congress (2023-2024): Future of Artificial Intelligence Innovation Act of 2024 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

[4] See America’s AI Action Plan .

[5] Nightshade

[6] Glaze

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jared Stipelman

Jared is a New York corporate attorney specializing in regulatory compliance. While active in several fields, Jared focuses his practice on employee benefits, trademark prosecution, and business acquisitions, particularly in the fields of e-commerce and health and beauty. He also provides pro bono counsel to charities devoted to animal welfare and responsible land use and has published writings on matters ranging from anti-counterfeiting operations to the trademark doctrine of foreign equivalents.

More Articles

Business & Corporate Law

Qualified Small Business Stock: 2025 Update

We’ve previously written about Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) and the potential tax benefits that come with it if you structure your entity appropriately. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which was signed into law on July 4, 2025, expands the tax exemption available for QSBS and now further incentivizes business owners to structure their qualifying companies in a manner that will take advantage of the new rules.

Read More »
Business & Corporate Law

Certificated vs. Uncertificated Stock: What’s the Difference and Why It Matters

When it comes to owning stock, most people think about the ups and downs of share prices – not the paperwork behind their ownership. However, how your stock is recorded can have real implications. In today’s digitized world, the distinction between certificated and uncertificated stock is more relevant than ever, especially for startups, private companies, and investors managing equity in various forms.

Read More »
Intellectual Property

The Rise of NFT and Metaverse Trademark Filings: What Businesses Need to Know

As virtual goods, blockchain-based assets, and immersive online environments become increasingly mainstream, the world of trademark law is rapidly expanding to accommodate them. Businesses entering the NFT and metaverse space are finding that traditional intellectual property principles still apply, but in novel and evolving ways. Trademark filings related to non-fungible tokens (NFTs), virtual goods, and metaverse platforms have surged, prompting both opportunities and legal uncertainties.

Read More »