Department of Labor Issues Final Rule on Employee v. Contractor Classification

Jason Fisher

Share Post:

Proper classification of workers as employees or independent contractors is incredibly important for all businesses and the U.S. Department of Labor (“USDOL”) has just issued a final rule that makes it more difficult for business to classify individuals as independent contractors.

The final rule was published on January 10, 2024, and goes into effect March 11, 2024. It revises the USDOL’s guidance on how to analyze who is an employee and who is a contractor under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). The prior guidance, published during the Trump Administration, focused on only two factors: (1) the nature and degree of the worker’s control over the work, and (2) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss.

The new rule returns us to the totality of the circumstances test that was previously applied. This test requires consideration of six factors: (1) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss, (2) investments by the worker and the potential employer, (3) how permanent the work relationship is, (4) the nature and degree of control over the work, (5) whether the work is integral to the potential employer’s business, and (6) the skill and initiative required by the work.

Employees are entitled to more protections and rights under the FLSA than independent contractors such as minimum wage and overtime pay. This change signals an effort to combat the misclassification of workers as independent contractors and that courts will more often rule in favor of there being an employment relationship.

Misclassification can result in severe and expensive penalties including unpaid minimum wages and overtime, liquidated damages, and attorney fees. Employers should consider their current classifications and implement procedures and checklists to ensure contractor relationships are structured and maintained in a compliant manner. If you have any questions on worker classification and compliance with federal and state rules don’t hesitate to reach out to Milgrom & Daskam’s Employment Law team!

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

ASSOCIATE

Jason focuses his practice on corporate governance, commercial finance, commercial contracts, and employment law. He advises clients on all aspects of general corporate matters and strategic business decisions including organization structure, operating/shareholder agreements, and private debt and equity offerings.

More Articles

Real Estate Law

Mastering Commercial Lease Negotiation: A Tenant’s Guide to Success

Negotiating a commercial lease can be a daunting task for tenants, with significant implications for their business operations and bottom line. Whether securing office space, retail storefronts, or industrial facilities, tenants must navigate the complexities of lease agreements to maximize benefits and minimize risks. In this blog post, we offer invaluable tips and strategies to empower tenants in their commercial lease negotiations, ensuring favorable terms and enhanced peace of mind.

Read More »
Real Estate Law

Securing Tenants’ Obligations: Cash is King, Right?

Tenants often need to provide some financial assurance, commonly known as security, to ensure they fulfill their obligations under a commercial lease. Two widely used forms of security are the cash security deposit and the standby letter of credit.

Read More »
Miscellaneous

Your Communications with Your Attorney are Always Privileged… Right? Wrong.

Your communications with your attorney are always privileged… right? Wrong.
While the attorney-client privilege is one of the oldest and most sanctified of privileges, it is not without exceptions. Now adays, when you communicate with a family law attorney, an attorney assisting you with estate planning, or an attorney representing you in a civil case,you are often doing so via email. But you can unintentionally waive the privilege if you communicate with your lawyer from your work email address, or even from a personal email address accessed on your work computer.

Read More »