Do Colorado Courts Still Enforce Liquidated Damages Provisions?

Amanda Milgrom

Share Post:

Do Colorado courts still enforce liquidated damages provisions? When are such provisions enforceable? As a litigator, I notice this is a frequent topic of conversation among my transactional attorney friends when they are drafting contracts with no real consensus. So, what does Colorado law say?

The quick answer is yes, liquidated damages provisions are enforceable in Colorado so long as they do not constitute a “penalty.” The Court in Board of County Com’rs of Adams County v. City and County of Denver laid out the following test to determine if and when a liquidated damages clause is enforceable (i.e., when they do not constitute a penalty): (1) were the anticipated damages difficult to ascertain when the contract was entered into?; (2) did the parties mutually intend to liquidate them in advance?; and (3) was the amount of liquidated damages, at the time the contract was made, a reasonable estimate of the potential actual damages the breach would cause?[1] If the answer to all three questions is yes, then the clause is enforceable.[2]

The second question may be difficult to answer – how does a court know whether the parties intended, mutually, to liquidate the damages in advance? A court will look at a number of factors, including the contract’s subject matter and the purposes and objects it seeks to accomplish. A court may also look at the circumstances surrounding the creation.[3] Thus, it is critical that a contract that contains a liquidated damages clause be drafted to shed light on these three questions.

Another question arises when a contract offers the non-breaching party the choice between actual and liquidated damages. Colorado courts will uphold the enforceability of the liquidated damages clause [4] even in this scenario. While states are split on this question, Colorado falls on the side of enforceability. This does not mean such a provision will always be upheld – it must  still satisfy the three factors. But the choice between two types of damages will not automatically void the liquidated damages clause.

Last but not least, beware – not all states will enforce a liquidated damages clause, so be cautious when advising clients entering into contracts outside of Colorado.

[1] 40 P.3d 25, 29 (Colo. App. 2001) (citing Perino v. Jarvis, 312 P.3d 108 (Colo. 1957)).

[2] See also Ravenstar LLC v. One Ski Hill Place LLC, 405 P.3d 298 (Colo. App. 2016).

[3] Powder Horn Constructors, Inc. v. City of Florence, 754 P.2d 356 (Colo. 1988).

[4] Ravenstar LLC v. One Ski Hill Place LLC, 405 P.3d 298, 303 (Colo. App. 2016), aff’d by 401 P.3d 552 (Colo. 2017).



Amanda Milgrom represents individuals and businesses of all sizes in various litigation matters regarding employment, intellectual property, and business disputes. She practices employment law, representing employees in discrimination lawsuits and counseling employers on best practices, drafting employee handbooks, and putting together suites of employment contracts.

More Articles

Business & Corporate Law

Recent Crypto Enforcement Actions and the Brewing Battle Between Regulators for Jurisdiction Over Digital Assets

Readers of my last, irresistibly juicy blog post, “First-Ever Court Ruling Means Your Utility Token May Be an Unregistered Security,” know that the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recently landed a blow against blockchain-based media company LBRY when a district court in New Hampshire held that LBRY’s native “utility token,” LBC, was an unregistered security.

Read More »
Entrepreneur & Startup

Entity Selection: How QSBS Could Save You Millions in Taxes

I often work with entrepreneurs starting new ventures. While there are multiple considerations for new businesses, the first important item to address is entity formation, governance, and finance/ownership. This is the starting point to get your venture headed in the right direction.

Read More »
Business & Corporate Law

The Importance of Morality Clauses in Contracts with Public Figures

In the age of social media and the 24-hour news cycle, opportunities for public figures to be called to the mat and canceled over their statements and behavior are plentiful. Whether looking at Kanye West, aka Ye, with his antisemitic statements on Twitter, “White Lives Matter” t-shirt at Paris Fashion Week, and a myriad of other public offenses, T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach’s affair, or Try Guys’ Ned Fulmer’s affair with an employee, when the transgressions become public, so do the calls from the public for the brands and companies they work with to cut them loose.

Read More »