The Impending Corporate Transparency Act 

Jonathan Milgrom

Share Post:

In the rapidly changing landscape of corporate governance, the Corporate Transparency Act stands out as a significant piece of legislation aimed at curbing illicit activities and enhancing transparency in company operations. For businesses, investors, and legal practitioners, understanding the Act is vital not only for compliance but also to stay ahead in a market that increasingly values transparency and ethical business practices.

Background

The Corporate Transparency Act was enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. The Act primarily addresses concerns related to anonymous shell companies, which have, in the past, been utilized for money laundering, financing terrorism, and other illicit activities. One of the primary objectives of the Act is to make it more challenging for individuals to conceal their identities behind such entities.

Key Disclosure Provisions

  1. Incorporator Reporting: The Act requires the individuals causing the company to be formed to disclose identifying information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). This could be interpreted broadly to include different individuals in the chain of authority, including business owners, attorneys, paralegals, CPAs, etc. We will look for further guidance as the year end nears.
  2. Beneficial Ownership Reporting: The Act mandates that certain U.S. businesses disclose their “beneficial owners” to FinCEN. A beneficial owner is defined as any individual who exercises substantial control over a company or owns 25% or more of its equity interests. By doing so, the Act seeks to ensure that the real people behind companies are known to regulators.
  3. Limited Exemptions: The Act casts a wide net and applies to all entities that are required to file documents with a secretary of state or similar governing body. Established entities like publicly traded companies, banks, credit unions, and certain regulated investment companies are exempt, primarily because they already face strict regulatory reporting requirements.
  4. Privacy Considerations: Although beneficial ownership information is to be reported to FinCEN, the data won’t be available to the general public. Access is restricted to specific law enforcement agencies for investigative purposes.
  5. Penalties for Non-Compliance: The Act has teeth. Entities, or their agents, that purposely provide false information or fail to report beneficial ownership data can face civil penalties and even criminal charges that can lead to imprisonment.

Timeline for Reporting and Duties to Keep Current

One critical aspect to note about the Corporate Transparency Act is the timeline for reporting and the continuous obligation to update the information provided.

  1. Initial Reporting Requirements: Companies formed after January 1, 2024 must submit the required beneficial ownership information at the time of formation or registration. This means new businesses won’t have a grace period and should be prepared to provide these details upon inception. In practice, this will require changes to a number of routine transactions where companies are created but ownership is decided further down the road.
  2. Existing Entities: For companies that are already in existence, there will be a transitional period. These businesses will generally have until 2025 to comply with reporting requirements.
  3. Duties to Update: One of the crucial components of the Act is not just the initial reporting but also the duty to keep the reported information current. Entities are required to report changes in beneficial ownership or the provided information within a specified timeframe. This ensures that the data held by FinCEN remains accurate and up-to-date. Present guidance suggests changes to addresses, license or passport numbers, and other personal information will need to be kept current. This could be an onerous obligation for owners to keep tabs on passive investors.
  4. Anticipated Clarifications: As the Act is still in its early stages, businesses should be on the lookout for additional guidance and clarifications, especially concerning the precise timelines for reporting. The Treasury is expected to issue detailed regulations that will provide clearer instructions on how and when to submit and update beneficial ownership information.

The CTA will affect nearly every company we work with. By keeping abreast of guidance and regulations, you can mitigate civil and potential criminal liability. The wave is coming. Don’t let it crash on you- get paddling now and you can hang ten instead of getting hung out to dry.

More Articles

B Corp

Building a People-First Culture: The Foundation of Intentional Leadership

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, organizations that prioritize their people don’t just survive—they thrive. Building an intentional people-first culture isn’t just a feel-good initiative; it’s a strategic imperative that drives performance, innovation, and sustainable growth. At Milgrom Daskam & Ellis, our commitment to people-first principles is embedded in everything we do, from how we serve our clients to how we treat each other.

Read More »
Artificial Intelligence

What Makes Jared Better than Claude

It can be hard to escape the steady drumbeat of news articles, think pieces, or orders from your company’s HR department about how various forms of artificial intelligence will revolutionize the way work is done. If everyone has the tools to be their own lawyer, accountant, corporate strategist, designer, and software engineer, then so much of the drudgery of our jobs will evaporate, and the best ideas and most creative, driven people will succeed.

Read More »
Artificial Intelligence

Use of Artificial Intelligence Defeats Attorney-Client Privilege

The use of artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity has infiltrated most workplaces, and the legal profession is no exception. Addressing a “question of first impression nationwide,” Judge Rakoff issued a decision of the Southern District of New York in United States v. Heppner has wide-ranging implications for both legal counsel and their clients.

Read More »