Estate Planning

Estate Planning FAQs

Estate Planning FAQs

Kim Raemdonck

Share Post:

No one wants to think about the end of life. It’s a difficult, grief-stricken conversation that can be made tougher by uncertainty. This is why one of the most important ways we can show our loved ones how much we care about them is by making plans ahead of time. You may not see the need for estate planning now – you’re young and healthy, or don’t consider yourself wealthy, or aren’t sure what you want. But the best time to start is now, if not for you, for your loved ones. 

So, you may be asking: where do I start? Estate planning typically involves creation of basic documents, such as a Last Will and Testament, Living Will, Medical Power of Attorney, Financial Power of Attorney, and a Disposition of Last Remains. You may need all or some of those. They may be very straightforward or more complicated. Legacy Planning & Probate is here to simplify the process, address your needs, and provide you with peace of mind. Read on for some additional information and tips to get the process moving. 

Why do I need a Will? I’ll just let my kids hash it out when I’m gone and enjoy them, now, without ruffling feathers!

Having your estate planning affairs in place prior to your death is one of the best gifts you can give your family. In your will, you can direct to whom your assets are distributed and who will manage your affairs after your death.  If there are certain individuals who you do not want to leave anything to, you can also state this in your will. Being clear in your estate planning provides peace of mind for your friends and family members in an already difficult situation because your loved ones will feel confident that they are carrying out your wishes.  We are committed to giving you the tools you need to manage difficult conversations and plan for the future.

Does a Will override a beneficiary designation? 

A Will does not override a beneficiary designation. This is why reviewing your financial information during your estate planning discussions is an important step in the planning process.  At Legacy Planning and Probate, we work closely with you as we know that each circumstance is unique, and that everyone has issues that require nuanced care and patient understanding.

What is the difference between a Living Will and a Medical Power of Attorney?

Health care directives are an invaluable tool for getting you the care you want. But, because they only come up when you are unable to articulate those wants for yourself, it’s important to make those wishes clear when you are in an emotionally, mentally, and physically competent state. Many clients worry their unique requests or specific wishes won’t be honored by the healthcare system or their family members. Some do not have close family members to rely on, either. Simply put, a Living Will allows you to make known whether you would like life-prolonging medical treatments and for how long. A Living Will only takes effect when you are incapacitated and there is no real hope of recovery. A Medical Power of Attorney allows you to appoint someone to serve as your agent to make medical decisions should you become incapacitated.  

Why do I need a Financial Power of Attorney?

A Financial Power of Attorney, also known as a Durable Power of Attorney for Finances, names an agent that you trust to make financial decisions when you are unable to communicate your wishes. Our firm urges clients to consider including this document in their estate planning to ensure powers are streamlined when you need it most. Financial institutions are becoming more particular about allowing non-account holders to access accounts, even in cases of basic functions like paying bills. Financial Powers of Atorney can grant the agent the ability to perform important functions, such as file tax returns, buy/sell/manage real estate properties or vehicles, conduct business transactions, borrow money, handle insurance claims, etc. During an initial consultation, we will work with you to unpack your specific goals and the precise powers to include in your document. 

I’ll let my family figure out whatever is the best when the time comes. I don’t want to be a burden. Why would I specify things in a Disposition of Last Remains?

We constantly hear from clients that one of their biggest fears is becoming a burden on their family members later in life. We understand. Our solution is to help you clearly, thoughtfully, and compassionately explain details of how you’d like your body treated after you pass.  You can be as specific or as broad as you’d like, but often clients consider (and specify) how they want their body treated and where they’d like their remains to be located. But there are additional details you could include. Maybe you’d like to provide for your family members to go to your favorite destination and have a family trip in your memory. Whatever your unique intentions, we pride ourselves on working closely with our clients to discover their specific needs so that we can make challenging topics simple, straightforward, and educational. 

I don’t want to create “trust fund kids”. Why should I establish a Trust?

A Trust is a common method by which you can care for your loved ones when you’re no longer able. It’s true that some trusts are written in a way that allows beneficiaries to take advantage or otherwise enjoy a lifestyle that you may not like. The good news is that trusts can be flexible or fixed, and you can dictate the terms now to avoid unwanted behaviors down the road. In addition, trusts offer a variety of benefits that are worth considering. For instance, trusts can have tax benefits, they can help during times of illness or disability, and perhaps most importantly, trusts can help avoid the probate process. We can discuss the positives and negatives of trust formation and give you the opportunity to make the best decision for yourself and for your family. Whatever you decide, know that we are here to give you information and offer objective advice, and help you determine the path that works for you. 

We strive to help our clients and potential clients understand the depth and breadth of the industry! What other questions do you have about estate planning documents? Are you ready to get started? Be sure to contact us through the website by clicking here to send us a message with your questions or start the process. 



Kim Raemdonck was born in Galveston, Texas, and raised in Fort Worth, Texas. She graduated magna cum laude from Texas A&M University with honors. Kim went on to attend the University of Denver Sturm College of Law where she obtained a J.D. and an L.L.M. in taxation. She is admitted to practice law in Colorado and Texas and before the United States District Court for the District of Colorado and the United States Tax Court.

More Articles

Business & Corporate Law

Recent Crypto Enforcement Actions and the Brewing Battle Between Regulators for Jurisdiction Over Digital Assets

Readers of my last, irresistibly juicy blog post, “First-Ever Court Ruling Means Your Utility Token May Be an Unregistered Security,” know that the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recently landed a blow against blockchain-based media company LBRY when a district court in New Hampshire held that LBRY’s native “utility token,” LBC, was an unregistered security.

Read More »
Entrepreneur & Startup

Entity Selection: How QSBS Could Save You Millions in Taxes

I often work with entrepreneurs starting new ventures. While there are multiple considerations for new businesses, the first important item to address is entity formation, governance, and finance/ownership. This is the starting point to get your venture headed in the right direction.

Read More »
Business & Corporate Law

Do Colorado Courts Still Enforce Liquidated Damages Provisions?

Do Colorado courts still enforce liquidated damages provisions? When are such provisions enforceable? As a litigator, I notice this is a frequent topic of conversation among my transactional attorney friends when they are drafting contracts with no real consensus. So, what does Colorado law say?

Read More »

The Diverging Paths of AI Regulation

The Diverging Paths of AI Regulation

Milgrom Team

Share Post:

The Google Pixel 6 launched recently.  Among its many most anticipated features are new artificial intelligence and machine learning features (“AI”), including its speech translation and recognition, and its AI photo editing software.  Indeed, although the phone has significant hardware advancements, most commentators recognized that AI advancements were the driving factor behind its success.

This focus on the benefits of AI follows a longer societal trend where there is increasing recognition that AI has countless untapped benefits.  Whether it was Alphazero demonstrating new playing styles in chess,  dramatically improving efficiency in insurance writing and claims processing, or countries using facial recognition to monitor their citizens, AI is and will continue to fundamentally change the world.

However, countries’ recognition and reaction to AI has not been consistent.  Europe, as expected because of its strong stance on individual data rights and privacy, has launched the most aggressive and restrictive stance against the use of AI.  Back in 2018, the European Economic Area passed the General Data Protection Regulation, restricting the use of some automated decision making.  Additionally, in April 21, 2021, the European Union released a draft of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, which further attempted to regulate AI through harmonized rules within the European Union.  The breadth of the proposed rules is broad – it applies to those outside of the EU that market or provide AI systems to the EU – and the definition of AI is broadly defined, encompassing processes which could reasonably be considered AI. 

The proposed rules separate AI into three different tiers of risk: unacceptable risk AI systems, high risk systems, and limited and minimal risk AI systems. Unacceptable risk AI systems such as social scoring or real time remote biometric identification systems are fully banned under the proposed laws.  High risk AI systems, including systems that evaluate a consumer’s creditworthiness or use biometric identification in non-public spaces require company oversight, including conducting audits that are similar to Data Protection Impact Assessments to ensure that the systems perform as intended and are secured. Low risk systems continue to have little oversight as the authorities are less concerned about potential abuses with this AI.

On the other end of the spectrum, China has fully embraced the use of AI.  Instead of worrying about any negative privacy implications, China has leaned on AI as a tool to build its society and government.   Among the uses getting most coverage are China’s use of facial recognition and other AI methods to keep tabs on its citizens, such as the use of AI emotion-detection software on Uyghurs. More generally however, China has woven AI into its social fabric by using it for everyday operations including its social credit system which monitors its citizens and rewards them or punishes them for things they do, its payment and communications systems, or even its defense systems.  This general acceptance for AI has been backed by formal legislation such as the ”Made in China 2025” plan or “Next Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan”.  The effect has been a boom in the research, use, and acceptance of AI (e.g., where as China previously lagged behind in AI research, China has now become the frontrunner.)  

Meanwhile, the United States stands in the middle of these two extremes.  Like the EU, the United States has agreed that AI should be used in ways that are “based on shared democratic values, including respect for human rights”.  Significantly, the U.S. and EU agreed that AI should not be used for social credit scoring.   However, the U.S. does not seem to share the EU’s concern over the other potentially invasive and threatening ways that AI could be used and has not publicly committed to a robust federal framework that addresses these AI issues. Instead, the U.S. appears to be concerned over the strategic and geopolitical issues that advanced AI will present, especially if other actors like China become world leaders.

Thus, because of the significant developments in AI and what those developments mean, all countries have been forced reckon with AI regulation.  However, geopolitical, historical, and other regulatory forces have created responses that dramatically differ throughout the world.  These responses have not only changed the trajectory of AI development in various parts of the world but also increasingly left out the possibility of harmonious AI regulation.  

For additional information, please contact us.

More Articles

Business & Corporate Law

The Importance of Morality Clauses in Contracts with Public Figures

In the age of social media and the 24-hour news cycle, opportunities for public figures to be called to the mat and canceled over their statements and behavior are plentiful. Whether looking at Kanye West, aka Ye, with his antisemitic statements on Twitter, “White Lives Matter” t-shirt at Paris Fashion Week, and a myriad of other public offenses, T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach’s affair, or Try Guys’ Ned Fulmer’s affair with an employee, when the transgressions become public, so do the calls from the public for the brands and companies they work with to cut them loose.

Read More »
Employment Law

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on Colorado Business’s First Amendment Speech Rights

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments last month in a case challenging the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA) in a scenario similar to the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision of 2018. 303 Creative LLC, a Colorado based graphic design service is seeking to provide wedding website design services but only for opposite-sex weddings due to the owner’s religious beliefs that preclude her from providing the same services for same-sex couples.

Read More »